Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2025 at 11:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Marine
- Info created by Hugo Graf, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 21:08:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_snow_sports
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry no, not when four logos overpower the poor skier. They roughly take up more space in the photo than she does and are too intrusive for me. --Cart (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 19:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral I would expect more details and more sharpness. The composition is quite good, very good. --XRay 💬 11:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 04:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ooof, envy! Photographing such a white building in strong sunlight is just begging for trouble. One of the hardest things you can do with a camera and you pulled it off. --Cart (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cart. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:10, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 04:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg -- Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent quality, angle and colors, but crop is a bit too tight for me on the left side. --Cart (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 23:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Water transport infrastructure
- Info Sunset at the marina of Gudhjem, island of Bornholm -- all by me --A.Savin 23:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 23:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 12:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 22:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Lamiaceae
- Info created by Kod B – uploaded by Kod B – nominated by Kod B -- Kod B (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Kod B (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Hi Kod B (please excuse my bad French), bienvenue dans FPC et plein de nouvelles choses à apprendre. Une photo très nette et agréable, d'une qualité vraiment excellente pour une photo prise avec un smartphone. Lorsque vous nominez des photos ici, assurez-vous qu'elles sont bien classées et qu'elles contiennent une description complète. Un FP ne se résume pas à la photo, il s'agit aussi de la documenter. J'ai corrigé ce problème et je pense que vous pourrez le faire vous-même à l'avenir. Avec une photo aussi nette et presque minimaliste, il faut une composition et un cadrage parfaits. Je pense qu'il serait préférable de la faire pivoter légèrement, afin que la nervure médiane de la feuille inférieure se retrouve dans le coin (comme ici). Qu'en pensez-vous? --Cart (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @W.carter
- Merci pour ces remarques ! Kod B (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 21:38:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Sailing ships
- Info Sailing ship Luciana of the Netherlands was built as a lugger but has been converted for cruises. Here she is outside the North Harbor in Lysekil, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful whole and light for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 21:29:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Recurvirostra
- Info American avocet (Recurvirostra americana) fishing. They stick their bill into the water and do a little swish to the side to try to pick up prey. Note there is another FP of this bird here, but it seems worth featuring this different perspective. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Sublime. --Cart (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:37, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 17:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info I really like the pink-gold light in this picture, it gives me a sense of gentle, sleepy beauty. I also like the wall of clouds rolling in at the horizon. created by Nino Verde – uploaded by Nino Verde – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely scene. A bit of red/green CA though, any chance of cleaning that up? --Cart (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info Very high quality church interior with beautiful golden light. No FPs of this church. created by Poco a poco – uploaded by Poco a poco – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you, Cmao20! I also took the liberty to made some improvements Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:12, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 15:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#People at work
- Info Cobbler on work, Bitola, North Macedonia. Despite bottom crop. --Mile (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support I simply love everything about this documentary photo. Excellent! --Cart (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, composition, and atmosphere. Bottom crop doesn't bother me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support You're onto something! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:46, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Bottom crop is a bit short, but well... --Yann (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 13:07:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1950-1959
- Info US Marine during the 1958 Lebanon crisis. Uploaded by FunkMonk – nominated by Poppytarts -- Poppytarts (talk) 13:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poppytarts (talk) 13:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment There are a few white spots to clean. Yann (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 05:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
- Info View from Motta Naluns on the Alps above Ardez. The weather was very changeable. One moment sunshine, the next moment hail showers. In the foreground a beautifully shaped larch in autumn colours. The white stripes in the background are hailstones.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like the mist and the hailstones Cmao20 (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 06:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:45, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:46, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support It’s great how the Larix stands out against the mountains; a contrast of colours and structures. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2025 at 03:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Show: Let's Dance: Lina Larissa Strahl with her dance partner Zsolt Sándor Cseke; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
- Support -- Stepro (talk) 03:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 11:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Question Is the pink cast fixable? Yann (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's stage lights so it's a part of the act/event. Dancers in these shows very often dance under colored lights to enhance the ambience. I think the light immediately lets people know this is a staged event and not just two people engaged in an altercation. We have other FPs with similar light.--Cart (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's exactly as Cart says. I wouldn't change the color because it corresponds to reality. Stepro (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's stage lights so it's a part of the act/event. Dancers in these shows very often dance under colored lights to enhance the ambience. I think the light immediately lets people know this is a staged event and not just two people engaged in an altercation. We have other FPs with similar light.--Cart (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Not sure about the image quality but I like the composition and I think it's a cool action shot. I don't mind the pink cast, it probably did look like this on stage. Cmao20 (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2025 at 21:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Megalaimidae (Asian_Barbets)
- Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 21:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 21:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Impressive and difficult capture but quality is barely okay and there is some JPEG artefacting. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2025 at 14:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
- Info probably created by the Webster Brothers – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 20:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Diogenidae (Left-handed Hermit Crabs)
- Info Pale anemone hermit (Dardanus deformis) with anemones (Calliactis polypus), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This nocturnal hermit crab is known to transfer sea anemones from one shell to another when it moves to a different shell. Note: we have no FPs of the species Dardanus deformis. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Whenever I see one of these big files, usually looking very bad at full size, I always download them and see how they would turn out if they are downsized to a more "normal" size. But even at 50% there is only a small part of the image that's in focus. Granted, with these small creatures it's very hard to get a large DoF, but still. The compo is also rather messy even though the colors are nice. I also think you do this an injustice by having the shadows so bright and the highlights so dull. A bit of a shallow S-curve would make the scene pop more and isolate the crab in the photo. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Sharp enough even at 4000 x 2667px. Yann (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. The 4000x2667 version is easily sharp enough and has the majority of the creature in focus, higher resolution above this is just an added bonus. Great photo. I agree the background is a bit messy but not going to be too picky with underwater photography of this quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 16:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
- Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Good detail and a very nice photo for identifying the species and probably a COM:QI. But the bar is very high for FP butterflies due to so many excellent photographers in that field. For an FP, I would expect some sort of artistic element in the photo (please compare with other Lepidoptera FPs) or at least one whole wing in focus. Here the DoF is dropping away from the center, leaving all the edges of the butterfly unsharp. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Fine by me, I don't think we should insist on a focus stack for every butterfly pic, a bit less sharp at the edges but stil good high resolution butterfly photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Focus stacking is not common for butterfly photos, just good angles and camera knowledge. --Cart (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support impressive --Stepro (talk) 03:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 12:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created & uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, and thankfully not a digitally added background. --Cart (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice find! Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cart. –Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 09:07:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Nectariniidae_(Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
- Info created by Sanjoykumar99 – uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice pair and colors, but I'd like to have both birds with the same focus and quality. Plus the framing is a little awkward, and I wouldn't mind some more info in the description on the file page. --Cart (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support The quality is okay for me, the bird on the left is less sharp but it's still quite sharp. I don't think the composition is that great, it's a little messy. But the fact that the photographer managed to capture a pair is impressive and tips it over into support Cmao20 (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is too cluttered Poco a poco (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support on the lines of Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice enough to look at, but a bit generic 'mountain reflection in lake' composition. DoF also seems a bit short, leaving the mountain unsharp. With such nice conditions, a few stops more wouldn't have hurt. --Cart (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cart. --Rbrechko (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:41:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
- Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:02, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Looks a little like a model railway --imehling (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Imehling, I really like this, one of Kabelleger's most satisfying photos Cmao20 (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Stepro (talk) 04:00, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:16:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
- Info From the English Wikipedia article: "The shell of this mollusc species has special significance to shell collectors because it was once regarded as the rarest shell in the world. For about two centuries between its initial discovery and the discovery of its habitat in 1969, specimens were valued in the thousands of U.S. dollars and generally only owned by museums and wealthy private collectors. Furthermore, the shell's popularity among collectors spawned urban legends, most notably the story of a collector purchasing one at auction in 1792 only to destroy it, to maintain the value of another one already in his collection. Improvements in diving technology such as the advent of scuba led to their discovery in larger numbers, and today shells can often be found from retailers or online auction sites for less than $100 U.S. Nonetheless, the legacy of this shell in addition to its pleasing shape and patterns makes it popular and desirable among shell collectors today.";
created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Llez (talk) 07:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Terragio67 (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great photo, such outstanding sharpness Cmao20 (talk) 19:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2025 at 16:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
- Info Downside of an AMD microprocessor (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). The golden elements and plate-like carrier emphasize this hardware created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poppytarts (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 12:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, this is technically excellent and with a really good composition, but the state of the phone is too off-putting for me. In some cases dust and signs of use, even spider webs, can add to the atmosphere in a photo (1, 2). But for a studio photo (with a meticulously clean background) of modern plastic antiques that are so easy to wipe clean, dust and grime visible even at thumb, is not a good look. Compare with the photos of Evan-Amos. For shots in situ at a period location, things are different. I would also expect better categorization from a veteran Commons user (I've fixed it now). --Cart (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support - Going to head the other way from Cart on this one. :) The retrotech fan in me likes the idea of giving an old, shabby phone, with all its flaws, the studio treatment. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was ready to support but after noting Cart's comment I just can't un-see it, sorry. I do think that makes it less than the high standard for an FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like reality as the highest standard. Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Looks as orderly as my desk ;-) --imehling (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but here I am with Cart; I would suggest to clone out at least some of the bigger scratches and pieces of dust from the table. – Aristeas (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 05:47:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Bolbitiaceae
- Info Bolbitius titubans. This delicate fungus grows between grass. Focus stack of 38 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:38, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Terragio67 (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 22:31:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Family : Odontodactylidae
- Info Peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus), Anilao, Philippines. This species ranges in size from 3–18 centimetres (1.2–7.1 in) and is a burrower, constructing U-shaped holes in the loose substrate near the bases of coral reefs in water ranging from 3–40 metres (9.8–131.2 ft). It's a smasher, with club-shaped raptorial appendages. An agile and active intertidal and sub-intertidal predator, it prefers gastropods, crustaceans, and bivalves, and will repeatedly deliver blunt force to the exoskeleton of its prey until it can gain access to the underlying soft tissue for consumption. It is reported to have a "punch" of over 80 km/h (50 miles/h), the fastest recorded punch of any living animal. The acceleration is similar to that in a .22 LR bullet fired from a handgun. Note: after reading this I definitely believe that I got too close to it. A smash would have broken my port lens and (by flooding) the camera and lens. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Superb detail on the eyes Cmao20 (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 21:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info Went to photograph a lake; came home with bike rack photo. Life as usual for a wiki photographer. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support A splash of fun in the world Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support The colours are awesome --imehling (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 20:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Works also very well as an abstract composition of harmonious simple shapes and well-chosen colours. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 15:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books_and_Paper
- Info digitized by the Polish Central Archives of Historical Records, uploaded by Lukasz Truscinski, nominated by Yann
- Info Janusz, prince of Wisła, Warsaw, Zakroczym and Ciechanów, grants the citizens of Warsaw the privilege to build a bathhouse and allocates the income from it to the needs of the city, 26 July 1376.
- Support Historical document is very high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Super high quality and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 12:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
* Oppose I'm sorry, I'm sure this looked amazing when seeing it IRL but per what I said below on the other nom, illumination like this will wipe out details in photos and it's not working here. There are too many layers of black/dark elements and it comes out a bit messy for me. A closer crop might have been better. --Cart (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The certain restlessness in Hochofenstraße is due to the many elements along the street. This underlines the former bustle - in my opinion. BTW: At daylight there are much more rusty steel. --XRay 💬 14:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have taken up your idea with the smaller crop. Thank you for this idea. I think the photo will benefit from it. --XRay 💬 14:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support That calmed things down considerably, thanks. Changed to support. And to answer your BTW, lots of rusty steel in daylight usually works since it's more subdued and uniform in color and daylight will be kinder to details. A really cool place, similar to Furillen on Gotland that I often used for model photos. I can spend weeks in places like these. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- The landscape park is also often used for filming. Scenes from “Tribute to Panem” were filmed there. When we were there now, filming was underway for “Babylon Berlin”. --XRay 💬 15:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:51, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view, and thanks to Cart for the crop suggestion which really helps the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2025 at 08:12:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
- Info a SSB-Drag-Bike. The aerodynamic full fairing is designed to be transparent for a better view to the technology. created by Auge=mit – uploaded by Auge=mit – nominated by Auge=mit -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support A very cool and interesting illustration of such bikes. I see that there is a bit of a difference (center front hole) where some parts of the bike have moved a bit between the shots, and as a result they are "doubled". Has any part of the image been created by some computer program or is it just two images merged? --Cart (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment it is all photoshop/handmade (two pictures on different layers plus some layers for the shadows)... an other version can be seen at commons (for a better understanding) best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- thanks to you too for finding the perfect gallery… Auge=mit (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice work.--Ermell (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Looks really cool. Was the Wikipedia wordmark added digitally? dllu (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it‘s digitally, because i found a lot of common-pictures on different websites without any appropriate credit - as required by the license… best regards, Auge=mit (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not against any rules but in this case with all the other stickers and advertising on the bike, it could be interpreted as if Wikipedia is sponsoring the bike and its driver, and that is misleading. I suggest you remove it. "Watermarking" images like this is not something that is done for the reason you are giving. Non-credited Commons pictures needs to be dealt with in other ways. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Done...--Auge=mit (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not against any rules but in this case with all the other stickers and advertising on the bike, it could be interpreted as if Wikipedia is sponsoring the bike and its driver, and that is misleading. I suggest you remove it. "Watermarking" images like this is not something that is done for the reason you are giving. Non-credited Commons pictures needs to be dealt with in other ways. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Cmao20 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Tue 18 Mar → Sun 23 Mar Wed 19 Mar → Mon 24 Mar Thu 20 Mar → Tue 25 Mar Fri 21 Mar → Wed 26 Mar Sat 22 Mar → Thu 27 Mar Sun 23 Mar → Fri 28 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Fri 14 Mar → Sun 23 Mar Sat 15 Mar → Mon 24 Mar Sun 16 Mar → Tue 25 Mar Mon 17 Mar → Wed 26 Mar Tue 18 Mar → Thu 27 Mar Wed 19 Mar → Fri 28 Mar Thu 20 Mar → Sat 29 Mar Fri 21 Mar → Sun 30 Mar Sat 22 Mar → Mon 31 Mar Sun 23 Mar → Tue 01 Apr
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.